Outcomes of the JICA
Vietnam Reproductive Health Project Phase II
The JICA RH Project Phase II (September 2000 - August 2005)
in Nghe An Province has been assessed by the Population Council,
and the report concluded that the project produced more than
expected. The JICA evaluation mission was dispatched in June
2005 and conducted a joint evaluation with Vietnamese counterparts,
which also confirmed and endorsed the successful implementation
of the project.

A mother with her new born child at the MCH Center
Lessons and recommendations from the field
1) Although the project focused on the commune level, close
contact was maintained with the national level, i.e., the
Reproductive Health Department, Ministry of Health. National
health policies were followed, and the project provided feedback
on concrete ways to implement these policies. For its part,
the ministry gave strong support to the project.
2) An important factor in ensuring sustainable development
after the project is strengthening the existing system and
human resources to enhance regular functions and roles. The
Vietnamese counterparts are proud that they worked without
any personnel cost and are confident to continue vital activities
after the end of the project.
3) Involvement of leaders of various agencies at all levels
created a conducive environment to promote RH. In addition,
out-reach IEC activities are necessary to further disseminate
the project.

Involvement of men: the project organized various IEC sessions
for commune people and invited representatives of various
mass organizations in order to involve male leaders and gain
support for the project activities at the grass root level
4) It is essential to identify and collaborate with organizations
that have strong grassroots networks in order to better disseminate
project outcomes. To date, the Women's Union has been a strong
partner.

Health education for women:
Women are eager to learn new knowledge
and get new information.
5) Training and post-training support (supportive monitoring)
are inseparable. It is not too much to say that the quality
of post-training support determines the effects of the training.
6) Training has to be realistic, repeated and steady. This
may seem basic, but in reality this point is surprisingly
easily and often forgotten as most donors are in a hurry to
see an outcome.

Commune Health Center (CHC) retraining:
a training session for CHC staff in charge of midwifery.
The project conducted 26 courses
throughout Phase I and II.
All the 469 CHCs in Nghe An Province
have midwifery staff trained by the project
7) The process of implementation is as important as the final
outcome. Patience is also necessary for human resource development.
When a donor is in haste to obtain outcomes with too much
focus on efficiency, the activities become donor driven and
the sense of ownership of counterparts reduced. An output-oriented
approach does not necessarily ensure sustainability.
8) The merits of dispatching long-term experts should not
be underestimated. The role of long-term experts is not merely
to provide technical support. The advantages of a long-term
stay in the field are, it enables:
- close communication and contact with counterparts
- involvement in the whole process of project implementation
with the counterparts
- appreciation of the daily efforts and progress made by
the counterparts
- understanding the difficulties that counterparts encounter
and the reasons why certain activities are not implemented
well
- appropriate timing of activities
- flexibility to meet changing conditions and needs, and
knowing when and how to be flexible
- establishment of mutual confidence and trust by revealing
the informal side of experts
9) Teamwork among the JICA experts is also essential. The
trust and confidence among the experts is as important as
the good relationship between the counterparts and experts.
10) It should be remembered that it is the counterparts who
make the final decision and selection on what is useful for
them, and that they are capable to do so.

At the final meeting for the provincial
and 19 district steering committee members
in August 2005.
The participants confirmed
that all are determined to continue utilizing knowledge
and skills accumulated through the RH Project
|